Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governors: Remove duplicate check of targetfreq in supported range

From: Stratos Karafotis
Date: Tue Aug 27 2013 - 11:46:11 EST


On 08/27/2013 08:57 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 August 2013 00:07, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ----
>
> Get rid of few more checks..
>
> /* if we are already at full speed then break out early */
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq == policy->max)
> return;
>
>
> /*
> * if we cannot reduce the frequency anymore, break out early
> */
> if (policy->cur == policy->min)
> return;
>

I think we should keep these checks because:

1) They shorten the execution code (there is no unnecessary call of
__cpufreq_driver_target)
2) In case my patch will be accepted, we need them to avoid continuously
increase of dbs_info->requested_freq.With my patch the requested_freq
can temporarily overcome policy->min and policy->max. __cpufreq_driver_target
will select the correct frequency (within policy->min and policy->max).
Then, dbs_cpufreq_notifier will adjust requested_freq.

I hope the logic in 2) to be acceptable.


Thanks,
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/