Re: [PATCH 12/13] tracing/uprobes: Add more fetch functions

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Tue Aug 27 2013 - 08:03:39 EST


(2013/08/27 17:48), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@xxxxxxx>
>
> Implement uprobe-specific stack and memory fetch functions and add
> them to the uprobes_fetch_type_table. Other fetch fucntions will be
> shared with kprobes.
>
> Original-patch-by: Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 9 ++-
> kernel/trace/trace_probe.h | 1 +
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> index eaee44d5d9d1..70cd3bfde5a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ struct deref_fetch_param {
> fetch_func_t fetch_size;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * For uprobes, it'll get a vaddr from first call_fetch() so pass NULL
> + * as a priv on the second dprm->fetch() not to translate it to vaddr again.
> + */
> #define DEFINE_FETCH_deref(type) \
> __kprobes void FETCH_FUNC_NAME(deref, type)(struct pt_regs *regs, \
> void *data, void *dest, void *priv) \
> @@ -110,13 +114,14 @@ __kprobes void FETCH_FUNC_NAME(deref, type)(struct pt_regs *regs, \
> call_fetch(&dprm->orig, regs, &addr, priv); \
> if (addr) { \
> addr += dprm->offset; \
> - dprm->fetch(regs, (void *)addr, dest, priv); \
> + dprm->fetch(regs, (void *)addr, dest, NULL); \
> } else \
> *(type *)dest = 0; \
> }
> DEFINE_BASIC_FETCH_FUNCS(deref)
> DEFINE_FETCH_deref(string)
>
> +/* Same as above */
> __kprobes void FETCH_FUNC_NAME(deref, string_size)(struct pt_regs *regs,
> void *data, void *dest, void *priv)
> {
> @@ -126,7 +131,7 @@ __kprobes void FETCH_FUNC_NAME(deref, string_size)(struct pt_regs *regs,
> call_fetch(&dprm->orig, regs, &addr, priv);
> if (addr && dprm->fetch_size) {
> addr += dprm->offset;
> - dprm->fetch_size(regs, (void *)addr, dest, priv);
> + dprm->fetch_size(regs, (void *)addr, dest, NULL);
> } else
> *(string_size *)dest = 0;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> index fc7edf3749ef..b1e7d722c354 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ ASSIGN_FETCH_FUNC(bitfield, ftype), \
> #define NR_FETCH_TYPES 10
>
> extern const struct fetch_type kprobes_fetch_type_table[];
> +extern const struct fetch_type uprobes_fetch_type_table[];
>
> static inline __kprobes void call_fetch(struct fetch_param *fprm,
> struct pt_regs *regs, void *dest, void *priv)
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index fc5f8aa62156..89d4b86abbe1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,186 @@ static const struct file_operations uprobe_profile_ops = {
> .release = seq_release,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
> +static unsigned long adjust_stack_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned n)
> +{
> + return addr - (n * sizeof(long));
> +}
> +
> +static bool within_user_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned int n)
> +{
> + return vma->vm_start <= adjust_stack_addr(addr, n);
> +}
> +#else
> +static unsigned long adjust_stack_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned n)
> +{
> + return addr + (n * sizeof(long));
> +}
> +
> +static bool within_user_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned int n)
> +{
> + return vma->vm_end >= adjust_stack_addr(addr, n);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static unsigned long get_user_stack_nth(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int n)
> +{
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + unsigned long addr = GET_USP(regs);

I recommend you to use user_stack_pointer() rather than GET_USP here.
Since some arch seem not to have correct GET_USP implementation (e.g. arm),
kernel build will be failed.

And at least trace_probe.c part is good for me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you,

--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/