Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

[Rik van Riel]

On 08/26/2013 08:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
>>> @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s
>>>                         tmp->parent = parent->parent;
>>>                         if (parent->parent)
>>>                                 parent->parent->child = tmp;
>>> +                       /*
>>> +                        * Transfer SD_PREFER_SIBLING down in case of a
>>> +                        * degenerate parent; the spans match for this
>>> +                        * so the property transfers.
>>> +                        */
>>> +                       if (parent->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
>>> +                               tmp->flags |= SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
>>>                         destroy_sched_domain(parent, cpu);
>>>                 } else
>>>                         tmp = tmp->parent;
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> BTW, did that comment make sense to you or would you suggest something
> different? I had/am having a hard time with that comment. Somehow it
> leaves me wanting. I know I understand the issue now, but I'll doubt the
> comment will suffice in a years time :/

The comment made sense to me :)

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/