Re: [PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida

[Kent Overstreet]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:31:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:09:06 +0000 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works),
> > it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all
> > nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu freelist
> > where the current job can't get to them.
> > 
> > We do guarantee that it will always be possible to allocate at least
> > (nr_tags / 2) tags - this is done by keeping track of which and how many
> > cpus have tags on their percpu freelists. On allocation failure if
> > enough cpus have tags that there could potentially be (nr_tags / 2) tags
> > stuck on remote percpu freelists, we then pick a remote cpu at random to
> > steal from.
> > 
> > Note that there's no cpu hotplug notifier - we don't care, because
> > steal_tags() will eventually get the down cpu's tags. We _could_ satisfy
> > more allocations if we had a notifier - but we'll still meet our
> > guarantees and it's absolutely not a correctness issue, so I don't think
> > it's worth the extra code.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >  include/linux/idr.h |   53 +++++++++
> >  lib/idr.c           |  316 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 
> I don't think this should be in idr.[ch] at all.  It has no
> relationship with the existing code.  Apart from duplicating its
> functionality :(

Well, in the full patch series it does make use of the non-percpu ida.
I'm still hoping to get the ida/idr rewrites in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/