Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx6q: refactor some ldb related clocks

From: Liu Ying
Date: Wed Aug 21 2013 - 00:20:23 EST


On 08/20/2013 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt
>> index 5a90a72..90e923e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt
>> @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ clocks and IDs.
>> gpu3d_shader 74
>> ipu1_podf 75
>> ipu2_podf 76
>> - ldb_di0_podf 77
>> - ldb_di1_podf 78
>> ipu1_di0_pre 79
>> ipu1_di1_pre 80
>> ipu2_di0_pre 81
>
> This causes a 'hole' in the clock numbering scheme: 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, etc
>

I find there is a 'hole' in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx5-clock.txt as well.
The 'hole' was taken by tve_di(26) clock before.

Is this more acceptable?

ldb_di0_podf_unused 77
ldb_di1_podf_unused 78

Liu Ying

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/