Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack

[Wolfram Sang]

Hi,

> > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > of the loop, I mean.

Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
Felipe to -next. Thanks!

> It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap,
> and will need the same change.

Somebody up for this?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature