Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures

[Tomasz Figa]

On Sunday 18 of August 2013 08:09:36 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 12:50 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > I wonder how would this handle uniprocessor ARM (pre-v7) cores, for
> > which
> > the updated bindings[1] define #address-cells = <0> and so no reg
> > property.
> > 
> > [1] - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/260795
> 
> Why did you do that in the binding ? That sounds like looking to create
> problems ...

[Copying Lorenzo...]

I'm not the author of the change. I was just passing by, while the 
question showed up in my mind. ;)

> Traditionally, UP setups just used "0" as the "reg" property on other
> architectures, why do differently ?

Right, especially since the ARM DT topology parsing code still considers a 
device tree without reg property in cpu node invalid.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/