Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/sparse: introduce alloc_usemap_and_memmap

From: Dave Hansen
Date: Thu Aug 15 2013 - 14:04:17 EST


On 08/14/2013 05:31 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> After commit 9bdac91424075("sparsemem: Put mem map for one node together."),
> vmemmap for one node will be allocated together, its logic is similiar as
> memory allocation for pageblock flags. This patch introduce alloc_usemap_and_memmap
> to extract the same logic of memory alloction for pageblock flags and vmemmap.

Shame on whoever copy-n-pasted that in the first place.

> -
> - for (pnum = 0; pnum < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; pnum++) {
> - struct mem_section *ms;
> -
> - if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
> - continue;
> - ms = __nr_to_section(pnum);
> - nodeid_begin = sparse_early_nid(ms);
> - pnum_begin = pnum;
> - break;
> - }
> - usemap_count = 1;
> - for (pnum = pnum_begin + 1; pnum < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; pnum++) {
> - struct mem_section *ms;
> - int nodeid;
> -
> - if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
> - continue;
> - ms = __nr_to_section(pnum);
> - nodeid = sparse_early_nid(ms);
> - if (nodeid == nodeid_begin) {
> - usemap_count++;
> - continue;
> - }
> - /* ok, we need to take cake of from pnum_begin to pnum - 1*/
> - sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node(usemap_map, pnum_begin, pnum,
> - usemap_count, nodeid_begin);
> - /* new start, update count etc*/
> - nodeid_begin = nodeid;
> - pnum_begin = pnum;
> - usemap_count = 1;
> - }
> - /* ok, last chunk */
> - sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node(usemap_map, pnum_begin, NR_MEM_SECTIONS,
> - usemap_count, nodeid_begin);
> + alloc_usemap_and_memmap(usemap_map, true);
...
> + alloc_usemap_and_memmap((unsigned long **)map_map, false);
> #endif

Why does alloc_usemap_and_memmap() take an 'unsigned long **'?
'unsigned long' is for the usemap and 'struct page' is for the memmap.
It's misleading to have it take an 'unsigned long **' and then just cast
it over to a 'struct page **' internally.

Also, what's the point of having a function that returns something in a
double-pointer, but that doesn't use its return value?

alloc_usemap_and_memmap() also needs a comment about what it's doing
with that pointer and its other argument.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/