[PATCH 1/3] locks: clean up comment typo

From: Jeff Layton
Date: Wed Aug 14 2013 - 08:26:48 EST

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
fs/locks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index a99adec..9f28359 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
* it seems like the reasonable thing to do.
* Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block
- * list itself is protected by the file_lock_list, but by ensuring that the
+ * list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring that the
* i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock
* in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/