Re: [PATCH] idr: Document ida tree sections

[Tejun Heo]

Hey, Kent.

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Should probably be almost as good, yeah... in theory, but the space
> efficiency still isn't going to be as good, and it'll probably be more
> code... and at this point I really just don't want to futz with it more.
> At this point unless there's something really wrong with this code I
> just want to move onto something else :P

I think it probably would be okay in most cases but don't feel
confident about acking as it's making trade-offs which are unnecessary
and unusual.  So, ummm, I really don't know.  Maybe it's better enough
than what we have now but at the same time if you want to reimplement
the whole thing you should be persistent / reliable enough to see it
through this time around too, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/