Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] arm: introduce a global dma_ops pointer

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Fri Aug 09 2013 - 11:37:38 EST


On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 05:30:50PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Initially set dma_ops to arm_dma_ops.

Looks OK to me.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
> CC: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Changes in v3:
> - keep using arm_dma_ops in dmabounce.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index 5b8eef9..5c130bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <asm/memory.h>
>
> #define DMA_ERROR_CODE (~0)
> +extern struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops;
> extern struct dma_map_ops arm_dma_ops;
> extern struct dma_map_ops arm_coherent_dma_ops;
>
> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> {
> if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
> - return &arm_dma_ops;
> + return dma_ops;
> }
>
> static inline void set_dma_ops(struct device *dev, struct dma_map_ops *ops)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 7f9b179..870b12c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ struct dma_map_ops arm_dma_ops = {
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_dma_ops);
>
> +struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops = &arm_dma_ops;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_ops);
> +
> static void *arm_coherent_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp, struct dma_attrs *attrs);
> static void arm_coherent_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/