Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/sys.c: return the current gid when error occurs

From: Chen Gang
Date: Thu Aug 08 2013 - 21:00:53 EST


On 08/08/2013 09:37 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 08/07/13 18:21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 08/06, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume that what the man page means is that the return value is
>>> whatever fsgid was prior to the call. On error, fsgid isn't changed, so
>>> the return value is still "current".
>>
>> Probably... Still
>>
>> On success, the previous value of fsuid is returned.
>> On error, the current value of fsuid is returned.
>>
>> looks confusing. sys_setfsuid() always returns the old value.
>>
>>> (FWIW, this behavior is awful and is probably the cause of a security
>>> bug or three, since success and failure are indistinguishable.
>>
>> At least this all looks strange.
>>
>> I dunno if we can change this old behaviour. I won't be surprized
>> if someone already uses setfsuid(-1) as getfsuid().
>>
>> And perhaps the man page should be changed. Add Michael.
>
> Thanks, Oleg. I've applied the following patch to setfsuid.2
> (and a similar patch to setfsgid.2).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> --- a/man2/setfsuid.2
> +++ b/man2/setfsuid.2
> @@ -67,12 +67,8 @@ matches either the real user ID, effective user ID, saved set-user-ID, or
> the current value of
> .IR fsuid .
> .SH RETURN VALUE
> -On success, the previous value of
> -.I fsuid
> -is returned.
> -On error, the current value of
> -.I fsuid
> -is returned.
> +On both success and failure,
> +this call returns the previous filesystem user ID of the caller.
> .SH VERSIONS
> This system call is present in Linux since version 1.2.
> .\" This system call is present since Linux 1.1.44
> @@ -102,7 +98,16 @@ The glibc
> .BR setfsuid ()
> wrapper function transparently deals with the variation across kernel versions.
> .SH BUGS
> -No error messages of any kind are returned to the caller.
> +No error indications of any kind are returned to the caller,
> +and the fact that both successful and unsuccessful calls return
> +the same value makes it impossible to directly determine
> +whether the call succeeded or failed.
> +Instead, the caller must resort to looking at the return value
> +from a further call such as
> +.IR setfsuid(\-1)
> +(which will always fail), in order to determine if a preceding call to
> +.BR setfsuid ()
> +changed the filesystem user ID.
> At the very
> least,
> .B EPERM
>

Is it suitable to mention this API is obsoleted and unneeded in man page
? ;-)


Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/