Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Aug 08 2013 - 19:09:45 EST

On 08/08/2013 02:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 06:02 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>>> On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>>>> Please let me know, if I should rebase again.
>>>>> tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need
>>>>> to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
>>>> Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
>>>> (Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
>>>> Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.
>>> >From the Xen standpoint anything past v3.11-rc4 would work.
>> For KVM as early as past v3.11-rc1 would be OK.
> I'm still completely confused as to the base of this patchset. The
> first patch has the following hunk for arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:

Okay, I figured it out.

One of several problems with the formatting of this patchset is that it
has one- and two-digit patch numbers in the headers, which meant that my
scripts tried to apply patch 10 first.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at