From email conversations internally, here are the current status of the errata:
addr -= 0x100;Hmm, are you sure this erratum is fixed in SR? Talk to Eric about it
}
@@ -205,8 +213,9 @@ static int amd64_set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf)
min_scrubrate = 0x0;
- /* F15h Erratum #505 */
- if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15)
+ /* F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f Erratum #505 */
first, please. RG says "No fix planned".
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 &&ditto.
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x30)
f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
return __amd64_set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
@@ -218,8 +227,9 @@ static int amd64_get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
u32 scrubval = 0;
int i, retval = -EINVAL;
- /* F15h Erratum #505 */
- if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15)
+ /* F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f Erratum #505 */
I have pinged some people about it, will let you know..
will send out changes in V3;Corrected the indentations; Removed unnecessary comments;
Thanks,
Aravind.