Re: [PATCH 1/1] audit_alloc: clear TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT if!audit_context

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 08/07, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > index 9845cb3..95293ab 100644
> > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > @@ -943,8 +943,10 @@ int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >                 return 0; /* Return if not auditing. */
> >
> >         state = audit_filter_task(tsk, &key);
> > -       if (state == AUDIT_DISABLED)
> > +       if (state == AUDIT_DISABLED) {
> > +               clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT);
> >                 return 0;
> > +       }
> >
> >         if (!(context = audit_alloc_context(state))) {
> >                 kfree(key);
> > --
> > 1.5.5.1
> >
> >
>
> Interestingly, I see no other callers of "clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,
> TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT)" :)
>
> This patch seems right, since TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is set only when
> audit_filter_task != AUDIT_DISABLED. Though maybe this should be
> explicitly handled in dup_task_struct()?

Personally I agree.

But note that we have more clear-tif-after-fork's. IOW, I think we
should probably add copy_tif_flags() or something which acts like
copy_flags(). TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE, TIF_SYSCALL_EMU, TIF_NEED_RESCHED
at least. Until then we should follow the copy-them-all-then-clear
rule.

Besides, if we add the new clear_tsk_thread_flag() into copy_process's
path we probably need ifdef or ifdef'ed helper.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/