Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value'result'

[Chen Gang]

On 08/07/2013 02:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have
>>>> to worry about it one way or another.
> []
>>> Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so,
>>> better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in
>>> the results, proofs or conclusions.
> []
>> You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to
>> know how to communicate in english...
> 
> I don't think that's true.
> 
> For instance, pessimization is a pretty
> obscure word.  Most native English speakers
> could probably guess what it meant, but I
> couldn't hold any low opinion of non-native
> speaker that asked "what does that mean".
> 
> The code communicates just fine.
> 
> Chen Gang could be a bit more careful when
> making significant changes to core kernel
> facilities.
> 

OK, thanks, I really should be more careful for making patches.

> (said the guy that broke just printk)
> 
> I think the fluent English speakers can be
> tolerant reasonably well when the code is
> correct and compelling (and correct).
> 
> cheers, Joe
> 
> 
> 

Thank you very much for your understanding.


-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/