Re: [PATCH RFC V11 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

[Raghavendra K T]

On 08/06/2013 04:20 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> So, having read through the entire thread I *think* this is what the
> status of this patchset is:
>
> 1. Patches 1-17 are noncontroversial, Raghavendra is going to send an
>     update split into two patchsets;

Yes.  Only one patch would be common to both host and guest which will
be sent as a separate patch.
I 'll rebase first patchset to -next and second patchset to kvm tree as
needed.

> 2. There are at least two versions of patch 15; I think the "PATCH
>     RESEND RFC" is the right one.

True.

> 3. Patch 18 is controversial but there are performance numbers; these
>     should be integrated in the patch description.

Current plan is to drop for patch 18 for now.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/