Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-designware: make *CNT values configurable

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Mon Aug 05 2013 - 06:02:37 EST

> > >Would it make sense to add generic I2C device tree properties for those
> > >parameters? These parameters are independent of the actual bus driver,
> > >rather a PCB property... And as such the correct place would be device
> > >tree or ACPI or similar.
> >
> > If there are other bus drivers that make use of tr/tf transition
> > times, I think it makes sense.
> Wolfram, what's your opinion on this?

If it is a PCB property, it makes sense to have generic bindings for
it. Can they have very-safe defaults and thus be optional?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature