Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:52:28AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> >>>> You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env->sd and
> >>>> not just the first group of env->sd like you are doing above. This is to
> >>>
> >>> I don't think so.
> >>> IIRC, env->sd->groups always means local group,
> >>> so we don't need to find our group by iterating over all the groups.
> >>
> >> Take a look at update_sd_lb_stats(). That should clarify this. There is
> >> an exclusive
> >> local_group check there.
> >>
> >> sd->groups points to the first group in the list of groups under this sd.
> > 
> > Take a look at: 88b8dac0a
> > 
> Ah ok! Thanks for this pointer.
> 
> Apologies for having overlooked the fact that the sd->groups always
> points to the group to which the balance_cpu belongs. And subsequent
> dst_cpus for retries of load balancing also belong to the same group as
> the balance_cpu.
> 
> This patch thus looks fine to me.

Okay!

> 
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/