Re: [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12

[Viresh Kumar]

On 3 August 2013 17:37, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Saturday, August 03, 2013 05:19:18 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> This patchset tries to fix & cleanup many existing cpufreq core issues. First
>> four patches tries to cleanup basic problems in cpufreq core. Its first patch
>> was earlier sent separately but now is part of this series.
>>
>> Fifth patch was also sent earlier as reply to your patches and was reviewed by
>> Srivatsa. Sixth patch was picked from Lukasz's patchset on introducing software
>> "boost" feature in core. It will be used by this patchset.
>>
>> And last four are the most significant part of this set. They try to make many
>> things simple and robust.
>>
>> This is rebased of your bleeding-edge branch + two patches from you:
>> 18a6b03 cpufreq: Avoid double kobject_put() for the same kobject in error code path
>> d0cde63 cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs
>> abe513f Merge branch 'acpi-sleep-next' into linux-next
>>
>> They are also pushed in my cpufreq-next branch
>
> How much testing has that received so far?

I planned to add this information but forgot at the last moment. It
was partially
tested. As it was mostly developed over the weekend I wasn't able to do much
of testing. I posted it to get early comments, and testing would complete by
beginning of next week.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/