On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 11:08 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:Didn't understand this comment.Added power cap framework documentation. This explains the use of power capping framework,[]
sys-fs and programming interface.
I think they are too small to realistically set a limits on power or measure. Let's see what others think.+Power Zone AttributesGiven that the ranges seem to be u64s, perhaps the
+=================================
+Monitoring attributes
+----------------------
+
+energy_uj (rw): Current energy counter in micro-joules. Write to energy counter
+resets the counter to zero. If the counter can not be reset, then this attribute
+is read-only.
+
+max_energy_range_uj (ro): Range of the above energy counter in micro-joules.
+
+power_uw (rw): Current power counter in micro-watts. Write to this counter
+resets the counter to zero. If the counter can not be reset, then this attribute
+is read-only.
+max_power_range_uw (ro): Range of the above energy counter in micro-watts.
+
+It is possible that some domains can have both power and energy counters and
+ranges, but at least one is mandatory.
lower bounds are too high. Why not nano/pico/fempto
watts/joules/seconds?
Thanks,