[PATCH] arm: zynq: hotplug: Remove unreachable code

From: Soren Brinkmann
Date: Thu Aug 01 2013 - 12:37:08 EST


zynq_platform_do_lowpower() does never return. Hence remove
all code which relies on that function returning and consolidate the
remains.

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c | 55 ++++----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c
index c89672b..5052c70 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c
@@ -40,44 +40,6 @@ static inline void zynq_cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
: "cc");
}

-static inline void zynq_cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
-{
- unsigned int v;
-
- asm volatile(
- " mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
- " orr %0, %0, %1\n"
- " mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
- " mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
- " orr %0, %0, #0x40\n"
- " mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
- : "=&r" (v)
- : "Ir" (CR_C)
- : "cc");
-}
-
-static inline void zynq_platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
-{
- /*
- * there is no power-control hardware on this platform, so all
- * we can do is put the core into WFI; this is safe as the calling
- * code will have already disabled interrupts
- */
- for (;;) {
- dsb();
- wfi();
-
- /*
- * Getting here, means that we have come out of WFI without
- * having been woken up - this shouldn't happen
- *
- * Just note it happening - when we're woken, we can report
- * its occurrence.
- */
- (*spurious)++;
- }
-}
-
/*
* platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU
*
@@ -85,20 +47,13 @@ static inline void zynq_platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
*/
void zynq_platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
- int spurious = 0;
-
- /*
- * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it
- */
zynq_cpu_enter_lowpower();
- zynq_platform_do_lowpower(cpu, &spurious);

/*
- * bring this CPU back into the world of cache
- * coherency, and then restore interrupts
+ * there is no power-control hardware on this platform, so all
+ * we can do is put the core into WFI; this is safe as the calling
+ * code will have already disabled interrupts
*/
- zynq_cpu_leave_lowpower();
-
- if (spurious)
- pr_warn("CPU%u: %u spurious wakeup calls\n", cpu, spurious);
+ for (;;)
+ cpu_do_idle();
}
--
1.8.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/