Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: init delayed_work for codec-codec links

From: Richard Fitzgerald
Date: Thu Aug 01 2013 - 11:14:05 EST

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > Pointing it to a dummy work callback is cleaner than taking
> > special cases in the code to bypass the flush_delayed_work_sync().
> Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to
> be used there?

By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for
standard PCM DAIs?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at