Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

[Dave Chinner]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here:
> >
> > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/
> >
> 
> "Current" is not precise enough... above tree has git-tags.

It's most certainly precise.  "current" always means the master
branch at the time the series was posted. I.e. same definition as
"top of tree"....

> As I am not a linux-fs expert I can try to test, preferably against a
> Linux-next release.
> Would you like to test against "vanilla" mmotm or is Linux-next
> suitable in your eyes?

mmotm is based on the linux-next tree at the time the tree was made.

> I have seen some typos... are you interested in such feedback?

feel free to point them out.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/