Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] arm: make SWIOTLB available

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Wed Jul 31 2013 - 20:34:04 EST


Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
>CC: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>index ba412e0..05125ab 100644
>--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>@@ -1832,6 +1832,13 @@ config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
> neutralized via a kernel panic.
> This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above.
>
>+config SWIOTLB
>+ def_bool y
>+ select NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH
>+
>+config IOMMU_HELPER
>+ def_bool SWIOTLB
>+

Could you explain the purpose of these two a bit more please?

> config XEN_DOM0
> def_bool y
> depends on XEN
>diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>index 5b579b9..ad89e0f 100644
>--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>@@ -86,6 +86,30 @@ static inline dma_addr_t virt_to_dma(struct device
>*dev, void *addr)
> }
> #endif
>
>+static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t
>paddr)
>+{
>+ unsigned int offset = paddr & ~PAGE_MASK;
>+ return pfn_to_dma(dev, paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
>+}
>+
>+static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t
>dev_addr)
>+{
>+ unsigned int offset = dev_addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
>+ return (dma_to_pfn(dev, dev_addr) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
>+}
>+
>+static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
>size_t size)
>+{
>+ if (!dev->dma_mask)
>+ return 0;
>+
>+ return addr + size - 1 <= *dev->dma_mask;
>+}
>+
>+static inline void dma_mark_clean(void *addr, size_t size)
>+{
>+}
>+
> /*
> * DMA errors are defined by all-bits-set in the DMA address.
> */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/