Re: [PATCH 0/8] perf: add ability to sample physical data addresses

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:21:41PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> One thing that bothers me with the MMAP2 approach is that
> it forces integration into perf.

This is a good (TM) thing, yes? ;-)

> Now, you will need to analyze
> the MMAP2 records. With my sample_type approach, you
> simply needed a cmdline option on perf record, and then
> you could dump the sample using perf report -D and feed
> them into a post-processing script. But now, the analysis
> needs to be integrated into perf or the tool needs to parse
> the full perf.data file.

So the disadvantage of the sample_type approach is that it generates
more data and bloats the fast path.

If its useful it shouldn't live in a script anyway ;-) Also if the
script muck can't deal with the side-band information its a worse broken
piece of crap than I thought it was.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/