Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given inusb_bind_phy

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:44:48AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:59:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>>> Previously MUSB wrapper (OMAP) device used PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO while creating
> >>>> MUSB core device. So in usb_bind_phy (binds the controller with the PHY), the
> >>>> device name of the controller had *.auto* in it. Since with using
> >>>> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, there is no way to know the exact device name in advance,
> >>>> the data given in usb_bind_phy became obsolete and usb_get_phy was failing.
> >>>> So MUSB wrapper was modified not to use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO. Corresponding
> >>>> change is done in board file here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c          |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c          |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c           |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c       |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c         |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ldp.c              |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c      |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c         |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c       |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c     |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c     |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c   |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c            |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rm680.c            |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51.c             |    2 +-
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c |    2 +-
> >>>>  16 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> >>>> index 244d8a5..17bb076 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> >>>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void __init omap_2430sdp_init(void)
> >>>>  	omap_hsmmc_init(mmc);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	omap_mux_init_signal("usb0hs_stp", OMAP_PULL_ENA | OMAP_PULL_UP);
> >>>> -	usb_bind_phy("musb-hdrc.0.auto", 0, "twl4030_usb");
> >>>> +	usb_bind_phy("musb-hdrc.0", 0, "twl4030_usb");
> >>>
> >>> how about moving usb_bind_phy() calls to omap2430.c ?
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> >>> index f44e8b5..b6abc1a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> >>> @@ -544,6 +544,9 @@ static int omap2430_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>  
> >>>  		pdata->board_data	= data;
> >>>  		pdata->config		= config;
> >>> +	} else {
> >>> +		/* bind the PHY */
> >>> +		usb_bind_phy(dev_name(&musb->dev), 0, "twl4030_usb");
> >>
> >> This looks like a hack IMHO to workaround the usb phy library. otherwise it is
> >> similar to get_phy_by_name.
> > 
> > actually, this is a workaround to the fact that we're not creating all
> > platform_devices in arch/arm/mach-omap2/ :-)
> > 
> > If we had the musb allocation there, we could easily handle
> > usb_bind_phy()
> > 
> >>> so that's temporary. It might be better than to reintroduce the IDR in
> >>> musb_core.c.
> >>
> >> thatâs needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s
> > 
> > right, but generic phy framework can handle everything just fine, the
> > only problem is that names are changing.
> 
> right. But if the names change, PHY framework wouldn't be able to return the
> reference to the PHY.

with my suggestion they can change whenever they want since we're using
dev_name() of the just-created musb platform_device. Right ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature