Re: Checkpatch error on trace events macros

From: Li Zefan
Date: Mon Jul 29 2013 - 22:08:02 EST


On 2013/7/30 9:58, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 09:30 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> On 2013/7/30 3:52, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>>> Hi Andy and Joe,
>>>
>>> Checkpatch is complaining when code adds new trace events macros:
>>>
>>> sarah@xanatos:~/git/kernels/xhci$ git am -s ~/Maildir.fetchmail/.to-apply
>>> Applying: xhci: add traces for debug messages in xhci_address_device()
>>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
>>> #86: FILE: drivers/usb/host/xhci-trace.h:15:
>>> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM xhci-hcd
>>>
>>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
>>> #115: FILE: drivers/usb/host/xhci-trace.h:44:
>>> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
>>>
>>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
>>> #118: FILE: drivers/usb/host/xhci-trace.h:47:
>>> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE xhci-trace
>>>
>>> total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 169 lines checked
>>>
>>>
>>> The macros have to be defined that way for trace events to work.
>>
>> yeah, that's true, and we always just ignore chechpatch complaints
>> when it comes to TRACE_EVENT macros.
>>
>>> Can you fix checkpatch not to complain about trace event macros?
>>>
>
> So what are these TRACE_<FOO> defines that need
> excluding from the "complex values" check?
>
> Anything other than
>
> TRACE_SYSTEM
> TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
> TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
>
> ?
>
> samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
> only has those 3.
>

Try:
# scripts/checkpatch.pl --file include/trace/events/*

You'll see numerous errors. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/