Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names givenin usb_bind_phy

From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Date: Mon Jul 29 2013 - 11:30:08 EST


Hi,

On Monday 29 July 2013 08:36 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:33:38PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Previously MUSB wrapper (OMAP) device used PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO while creating
>> MUSB core device. So in usb_bind_phy (binds the controller with the PHY), the
>> device name of the controller had *.auto* in it. Since with using
>> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, there is no way to know the exact device name in advance,
>> the data given in usb_bind_phy became obsolete and usb_get_phy was failing.
>> So MUSB wrapper was modified not to use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO. Corresponding
>> change is done in board file here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ldp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rm680.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c | 2 +-
>> 16 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
>> index 244d8a5..17bb076 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void __init omap_2430sdp_init(void)
>> omap_hsmmc_init(mmc);
>>
>> omap_mux_init_signal("usb0hs_stp", OMAP_PULL_ENA | OMAP_PULL_UP);
>> - usb_bind_phy("musb-hdrc.0.auto", 0, "twl4030_usb");
>> + usb_bind_phy("musb-hdrc.0", 0, "twl4030_usb");
>
> how about moving usb_bind_phy() calls to omap2430.c ?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> index f44e8b5..b6abc1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> @@ -544,6 +544,9 @@ static int omap2430_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pdata->board_data = data;
> pdata->config = config;
> + } else {
> + /* bind the PHY */
> + usb_bind_phy(dev_name(&musb->dev), 0, "twl4030_usb");

This looks like a hack IMHO to workaround the usb phy library. otherwise it is
similar to get_phy_by_name.
> }
>
> if (pdata->has_mailbox) {
>
> The only problem is if some board comes with a PHY other than
> twl4030_usb, but in that case we can add a separate compatible flag and
> treat it properly. We only need to bind the phy in non-DT case anyway,

right.
> so that's temporary. It might be better than to reintroduce the IDR in
> musb_core.c.

that’s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/