Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] tracing: open/delete fixes

[Masami Hiramatsu]

(2013/07/27 2:25), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Testing: seems to work, but assumes that debugs was fixed too. Hopefully
> "debugfs: debugfs_remove_recursive() must not rely on list_empty(d_subdirs)"
> is fine.
> 
> (We should probably make debugfs_remove_recursive() to return the error
>  and trace_events.c should warn if it fails)
> 
> However: I am still testing this patches, so this is still mostly for
> review. I'll report if I find anything, but to remind we have other
> bugs which need more fixes. And in fact I need to re-read this series
> to convince myself it should work, I was distracted by the unexpected
> problem in debugfs.
> 
> Changes: a lot but all cosmetic, addresses the comments from Steven.
> 
> Steven, 1/6 was not changed, I assume you agreed with my reply.
> 
> Masami, I'll appreciate your review ;)

I think this is OK except for the bisecting issue, as I pointed in
reply to 6/6. ;)

Thank you!

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/