Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we havepeople interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]

[Mark Brown]

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:50:19AM -0400, jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> "furture proof" is much easier to say that it is to do. We've been
> messing around with the audio bindings for three years and still don't
> have a really good scheme. It is pretty easy to come up with the first
> 90% of a device tree. It is really hard to work out that last 10%.

I wouldn't say that for audio - we've got a pretty solid idea of what's
going on and little if any churn.  If some more of the subsystems that
we rely on were working well we could do a bit more but it's mostly just
extensions of where we're at now.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature