Re: [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: oxygen: Updating jack implementation accordingnew ALSA Jacks

[Felipe Tonello]

Mark,

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:02:51PM -0700, Felipe Tonello wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >>       snd_jack_new(chip->card, "Headphone",
>> >> -                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, &data->hp_jack);
>> >> +                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, 0, &data->hp_jack);
>> >>       xonar_ds_handle_hp_jack(chip);
>
>> > ...this really ought to be done as part of the commit that adds the
>> > parameter since it breaks the build until this patch is applied.
>
>> But that's why is a patch series. But as you say, are you suggesting
>> me to propose this changes in one patch only?
>
> This one should be squashed in, as should the part of the ASoC change
> that adjusts for the call into the core API.  The general idea with a
> patch series is to split things into smaller chunks so they're easier to
> understand and review but still keep things working with each change so
> that things like git bisect continue to be usable.

Sure.

>
> So I guess something like one patch that changes the core jack API to
> add the index and support jack creation, one to remove the HDA custom
> implementation and one to add support for specifying the index to the
> ASoC API and adjust all its users.

I squashed into the HDA one. Perhaps I should send it again?

I don't know why, but my gmail is messing with the thread. If you
think it's better I can send a v3 with no --in-reply-to option.

Felipe Tonello
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/