RE: [PATCH] mfd: palmas: Add DVFS mux setting

[Andrew Chew]

> >> How does this interact with the pinctrl driver that Laxman just sent
> >> for Palmas?
> >>
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/26/141
> >> [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: palmas: add pincontrol driver
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out.  Given this:
> >
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- ti,palams-enable-dvfs1: Enable DVFS1. Configure pins for DVFS1 mode.
> > +- ti,palams-enable-dvfs2: Enable DVFS2. Configure pins for DVFS2 mode.
> >
> > I think his work already encompasses what my patch is supposed to do.
> >
> > Abandoning this patch.
> 
> OK, that's simple!
> 
> Are the existing ti,mux-pad1/ti,mux-pad2 properties already in the binding
> redundant with Laxman's pinctrl driver?

In linux-next (where I based my work), yes, those two properties already exist,
and as far as I understand it, are redundant with Laxman's pinctrl driver.
I expect those properties will go away with Laxman's pinctrl driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/