Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 7/26/2013 11:13 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Could you try running the tests with just the repeat mode
> stuff from commit 69a37bea excluded, but leaving the common
> infrastructure and commit e11538?

personally I think we should go the other way around.
revert the set entirely first, and now, and get our performance back
to what it should be

and then see what we can add back without causing the regressions.
this may take longer, or be done in steps, and that's ok.

the end point may well be the same... but we can then evaluate in the right
direction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/