Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm |drm-intel related? ]

[Sedat Dilek]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > Basically boils down to either an object allocation failure or mmaping
>>> > failure. I think dmesg with drm.debug=7 is the next step.
>>>
>>> Attached! Thanks for taking care.
>>
>> Hmm, looks like i915_gem_map_gtt fails, but no reason given, so can you
>> please apply this for more debug:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index 0563661..34e09bf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -1630,24 +1630,29 @@ i915_gem_mmap_gtt(struct drm_file *file,
>>
>>         obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, handle));
>>         if (&obj->base == NULL) {
>> +               DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Unknown object handle %d\n", handle);
>>                 ret = -ENOENT;
>>                 goto unlock;
>>         }
>>
>>         if (obj->base.size > dev_priv->gtt.mappable_end) {
>> +               DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Object (%d) larger than mappable aperture (%d) > %d\n",
>> +                               (int)obj->base.size, (int)dev_priv->gtt.mappable_end);
>>                 ret = -E2BIG;
>>                 goto out;
>>         }
>>
>>         if (obj->madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED) {
>> -               DRM_ERROR("Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer\n");
>> +               DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer\n");
>>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>>                 goto out;
>>         }
>>
>>         ret = i915_gem_object_create_mmap_offset(obj);
>> -       if (ret)
>> +       if (ret) {
>> +               DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Failed to allocate mmap offset (ret=%d)\n", ret);
>>                 goto out;
>> +       }
>>
>>         *offset = (u64)obj->base.map_list.hash.key << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> --
>
> This does not apply... After refreshing and some cleanups... does not build:
>
> $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C make M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915
>   LD      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/built-in.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.o
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function 'i915_gem_mmap_gtt':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1538:3: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.o] Error 1
> make: *** [_module_drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2
>

F*ck. Wrong patch refreshed.

- S.

> - Sedat -
>
>> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Attachment: 0001-i915-Debug-test-patch-to-see-why-i915_gem_map_gtt-fa.patch
Description: Binary data