RE: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: balloon: Online the hot-added memory"in context"

From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Wed Jul 24 2013 - 17:12:13 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hansen [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 5:04 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx;
> kamezawa.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxx; mhocko@xxxxxxx; hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: balloon: Online the hot-added memory "in
> context"
>
> On 07/24/2013 02:29 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > /*
> > - * Wait for the memory block to be onlined.
> > - * Since the hot add has succeeded, it is ok to
> > - * proceed even if the pages in the hot added region
> > - * have not been "onlined" within the allowed time.
> > + * Before proceeding to hot add the next segment,
> > + * online the segment that has been hot added.
> > */
> > - wait_for_completion_timeout(&dm_device.ol_waitevent,
> 5*HZ);
> > + online_memory_block(start_pfn);
>
> Ahhhhh.... You've got a timeout in the code in order to tell the
> hypervisor that you were successfully able to add the memory? The
> userspace addition code probably wasn't running within this timeout
> period. right?

As I have always said, the onlining would not occur within a specified amount
of time (under some conditions). The timeout here is to ensure that we are able
to online the memory before attempting to hot-add more memory. With the ability
to online memory from within the kernel, we don't need this timeout and the code is
much more predictable.

Regards,

K. Y



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/