Re: [PATCH v4 03/17] sched_clock: Use an hrtimer instead of timer

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:58:47AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/22/13 11:45, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Hmm. Is it too early to use hrtimers? Moving the hrtimer_start() into
> > sched_clock_register() also causes the same crash.
> 
> Yes that seems to be the problem. The vexpress board is setting up the
> sched_clock in setup_arch() (via v2m_init_early) which runs before
> hrtimers_init(). I've only tested this on boards that setup the timer in
> the time_init() callback which runs after hrtimers_init(). Your patch
> should be fine, although it would be nice if we didn't have callers
> setting up the sched_clock so early.

However, it _is_ the correct place to do it, as I've repeatedly stated.
The reason for this is that the scheduler will have already read from
sched_clock() by the time you get to timer_init() to seed its idea of
the start time for PID0 - again, as I've explained multiple times.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/