Re: [PATCH] f2fs: use list_for_each rather than list_for_each_safe, in remove_orphan_inode()

[Nikola Pajkovsky]

Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> As we remove the target single node, so list_for_each is enought, in order to
> clean up, we use list_for_each_entry instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 290db04..87f7bc2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ out:
>  
>  void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
>  {
> -	struct list_head *this, *next, *head;
> +	struct list_head *head;
>  	struct orphan_inode_entry *orphan;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
>  	head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list;
> -	list_for_each_safe(this, next, head) {
> -		orphan = list_entry(this, struct orphan_inode_entry, list);
> +	list_for_each_entry(orphan, head, list) {
>  		if (orphan->ino == ino) {
>  			list_del(&orphan->list);
>  			kmem_cache_free(orphan_entry_slab, orphan);

you have meant list_for_each_entry_safe, haven't you?

-- 
Nikola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/