Re: [PATCH] usb: udc: add gadget state kobject uevent

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Mon Jul 22 2013 - 05:29:20 EST


Hi,

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:50:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > > > yes. Only the UDC driver knows when the controller is moving among those
> > > > states.
> > >
> > > Not quite. Only the gadget driver knows when the transition between
> > > ADDRESS and CONFIGURED occurs. This should be added to composite.c.
> >
> > that's not entirely true :-) See how we handle that in dwc3:
> >
> > | static int dwc3_ep0_set_config(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
> > | {
> > | enum usb_device_state state = dwc->gadget.state;
> > | u32 cfg;
> > | int ret;
> > | u32 reg;
> > |
> > | dwc->start_config_issued = false;
> > | cfg = le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wValue);
> > |
> > | switch (state) {
> > | case USB_STATE_DEFAULT:
> > | return -EINVAL;
> > | break;
> > |
> > | case USB_STATE_ADDRESS:
> > | ret = dwc3_ep0_delegate_req(dwc, ctrl);
> > | /* if the cfg matches and the cfg is non zero */
> > | if (cfg && (!ret || (ret == USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS))) {
> > | usb_gadget_set_state(&dwc->gadget,
> > | USB_STATE_CONFIGURED);
>
> In theory, this should not occur until the gadget driver has finished
> the transition to the CONFIGURED state, which doesn't occur until later
> in the case of USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS.
>
> > |
> > | /*
> > | * Enable transition to U1/U2 state when
> > | * nothing is pending from application.
> > | */
> > | reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_DCTL);
> > | reg |= (DWC3_DCTL_ACCEPTU1ENA | DWC3_DCTL_ACCEPTU2ENA);
> > | dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_DCTL, reg);
> > |
> > | dwc->resize_fifos = true;
> > | dev_dbg(dwc->dev, "resize fifos flag SET\n");
> > | }
> > | break;
> > |
> > | case USB_STATE_CONFIGURED:
> > | ret = dwc3_ep0_delegate_req(dwc, ctrl);
> > | if (!cfg)
> > | usb_gadget_set_state(&dwc->gadget,
> > | USB_STATE_ADDRESS);
>
> No check on the value of ret? What if the request was rejected?
>
> > | break;
> > | default:
> > | ret = -EINVAL;
> > | }
> > | return ret;
> > | }
>
> This illustrates the folly of exposing your code to public review. :-)

it's always good to have extra eyes looking at the code, I'll patch
those up, but since it has always been like that and nobody complained,
I won't tag it for stable.

--
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature