Re: [PATCH] backports: backport drvdata = NULL core driver fixes

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The Linux kernel had tons of code which at times cleared the
>> drvdata upon probe failure or release. There are however a bunch
>> of drivers that didn't clear this.
>>
>> Commit 0998d063 implmented clearing this upon device_release_driver()
>> and dealt with probe failure on driver_probe_device(). After this the
>> kernel was cleaned up separately with *tons* of patches to remove all
>> these driver specific settings given that the clearing is now done
>> internally by the device core.
>>
>> Instead of ifdef'ing code back in for older code where it was properly
>> in place backport this by piggy backing the new required code upon the
>> calls used in place. There is a small race here upon device_release_driver()
>> but we can live with that theoretical race.
>>
>> Due to the way we hack this backport we can't use a separate namespace
>> as we have with other symbols.
>>
>> mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git describe --contains \
>>       0998d0631001288a5974afc0b2a5f568bcdecb4d
>> v3.6-rc1~99^2~14^2~17
>>
>> commit 0998d0631001288a5974afc0b2a5f568bcdecb4d
>> Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:   Wed May 23 00:09:34 2012 +0200
>>
>>     device-core: Ensure drvdata = NULL when no driver is bound
>>
>>     1) drvdata is for a driver to store a pointer to driver specific data
>>     2) If no driver is bound, there is no driver specific data associated with
>>        the device
>>     3) Thus logically drvdata should be NULL if no driver is bound.
>>
>>     But many drivers don't clear drvdata on device_release, or set drvdata
>>     early on in probe and leave it set on probe error. Both of which results
>>     in a dangling pointer in drvdata.
>>
>>     This patch enforce for drvdata to be NULL after device_release or on probe
>>     failure.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>     Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is not a very good idea.  Although setting drvdata to NULL allowed
> a lot of code to be removed, it also exposed a bunch of hidden bugs --
> drivers were using the drvdata value even after their remove function
> returned.

Eek, have we not SmPL'ify'd a proof yet to ensure code like this no
longer exists? Julia? :)

> Several commits have been applied to fix those bugs.

I actualy found *tons* !

> Finding and backporting them and their dependencies will not be easy.

May the SmPL proof be with us.

> I suggest this patch not be applied.

Thanks for the review Alan!

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/