Re: [PATCH v5] power: new trace event to print device suspend andresume time

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:29 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:

> Tried with temp variables. Patch is on its way with temp variables. I 
> generated .s with and without temp variables and didn't see any 
> difference. Should I be seeing a difference, if so what am I missing?
> 
> In any case, you have the patch v6 with temp variables.
> 

There may not be, matters how good gcc is in optimization.

Temp variables are fine to keep if they work.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/