Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine

From: Michael Wang
Date: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 22:15:57 EST


Hi, Peter

Davidlohr has tested the v3 patch set and it work well as reported (and
in my test too), I thing your patch has solved the issue he found in v2 :)

Thus I think v3 is ready for next step now, I wish it has not yet been
removed out of your apply-queue ;-)

Regards,
Michael Wang

On 07/15/2013 01:57 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
[snip]
>
> Sorry for the delay. I'm glad you reminded me since I already had the
> data.
>>
>> I suppose the issue have been addressed, but please let us know if v3
>> also show regression on your box, we could try to solve the problem ;-)
>
> It has, high_systime no longer shows a hit and all workloads remain
> basically the same.
>
> Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@xxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Wang
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael Wang
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Davidlohr
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/