Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

[Viresh Kumar]

On 16 July 2013 17:36, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:11:54 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx
> wrote,
>> On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> > +void cpufreq_set_boost_enabled(int state)
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [*]
>
>>
>> Maybe cpufreq_block_boost? As suggested by Rafael.
>
> What do you mean by cpufreq_block_boost()? This name would reverse the
> logic.
>
> Function [*] is used to change boost_enabled static flag (defined at
> cpufreq.c file) state according to acpi-cpufreq.c boost support status.

I misread it again :(

So, what about adding another field in struct cpufreq_driver: boost_enabled?
And get rid of the global boost_enabled we have used? Similar to how
boost_supported is used, then we don't need this routine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/