Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: at91/tc/clocksource: replace clk_enable/disablewith clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare.

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Jul 16 2013 - 11:48:46 EST


On 07/16/2013 05:05 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare to
> avoid common clk framework warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

This patch is part of a series and the recipients are also Thomas and
John (clocksource maintainers).

Is this patch going through Nicolas's tree or Thomas's tree ?

Thanks
-- Daniel

> drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c b/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
> index 8a61872..229c019 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void tc_mode(enum clock_event_mode m, struct clock_event_device *d)
> || tcd->clkevt.mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT) {
> __raw_writel(0xff, regs + ATMEL_TC_REG(2, IDR));
> __raw_writel(ATMEL_TC_CLKDIS, regs + ATMEL_TC_REG(2, CCR));
> - clk_disable(tcd->clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(tcd->clk);
> }
>
> switch (m) {
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void tc_mode(enum clock_event_mode m, struct clock_event_device *d)
> * of oneshot, we get lower overhead and improved accuracy.
> */
> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC:
> - clk_enable(tcd->clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(tcd->clk);
>
> /* slow clock, count up to RC, then irq and restart */
> __raw_writel(timer_clock
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void tc_mode(enum clock_event_mode m, struct clock_event_device *d)
> break;
>
> case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> - clk_enable(tcd->clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(tcd->clk);
>
> /* slow clock, count up to RC, then irq and stop */
> __raw_writel(timer_clock | ATMEL_TC_CPCSTOP
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int __init tcb_clksrc_init(void)
> pdev = tc->pdev;
>
> t0_clk = tc->clk[0];
> - clk_enable(t0_clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(t0_clk);
>
> /* How fast will we be counting? Pick something over 5 MHz. */
> rate = (u32) clk_get_rate(t0_clk);
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int __init tcb_clksrc_init(void)
> /* tclib will give us three clocks no matter what the
> * underlying platform supports.
> */
> - clk_enable(tc->clk[1]);
> + clk_prepare_enable(tc->clk[1]);
> /* setup both channel 0 & 1 */
> tcb_setup_dual_chan(tc, best_divisor_idx);
> }
>


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/