Re: nohz: Warn if the machine can not perform nohz_full

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:56 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 02:49:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>  
> Is a printk not enough for that purpose ? Tainting the kernel is kinda anti-social.
> 

printk's don't usually get peoples attention. Taints and warnings do. If
the hardware doesn't allow for nohz-full, and the only way to enable it
is via kernel command line, how do you scream to the user that it isn't
going to work.

We could do a large banner saying:

***************************************************************
***************************************************************
***************************************************************
***************************************************************
***                    UNSTABLE TSC                         ***
***                NO_HZ_FULL disabled                      ***
***************************************************************
***************************************************************
***************************************************************
***************************************************************


And not do the warning. Maybe that will get peoples attentions?

But then again, this could be lost in the boot up if the box prints a
lot of data.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/