Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del

From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Fri Jul 05 2013 - 18:12:19 EST


On Mon, 3 June 2013 13:28:03 -0400, Joern Engel wrote:
>
> A purely janitorial patchset. A fairly common pattern is to take a
> list, remove every object from it and do something with this object -
> usually kfree() some variant. A stupid grep identified roughly 300
> instances, with many more hidden behind more complicated patterns to
> achieve the same end results.

Next version of the same patchset. Object size is shrinking now, at
least for the one compiler I tested. And a few kernel hackers met on
a frozen lake in hell with pigs flying overhead and could actually
agree on a name. While I am sure almost every reader will still
disagree and have one or two better suggestions, I would like to use
this historical moment.

list_del_each and list_del_each_entry is shall be!

JÃrn

--
It's just what we asked for, but not what we want!
-- anonymous
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/