Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: s2mps11: Add device tree support

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:13:46PM +0530, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > That's just an issue in the code if that is the case, you can test for
> > the presence of a property independently of getting its value.

> Yes, for that we will need an extra flag (ramp_disable) in
> constraints, to figure out whether
> ramp-rate is actually set to zero or its left (by default) zero if we
> do it in common code as
> now we have locally in driver.

Yes, I agree that makes sense for the constraints.

> I think its matter of assumption, so to conclude our discussion,
> please let me know that which approach we should use:
> - assume "regulator-ramp-delay = <0>" as ramp_disable.
> or
> - parsing "regulator_ramp_disable" from DT.

I prefer the first option.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature