Re: [PATCH 4/4] regulator: s2mps11: Add device tree support

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 04:50:58PM +0530, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
>
>> +static void s2mps11_pmic_parse_dt(struct of_regulator_match *rdata,
>> +                                     struct s2mps11_info *s2mps11)
>> +{
>> +     if (!of_find_property(rdata[S2MPS11_BUCK2].of_node,
>> +                             "regulator-ramp-disable", NULL))
>> +             s2mps11->buck2_ramp = true;
>
> This property should be specific to this binding rather than named as a
> generic regulator property.  It's also a bit odd that setting a property
> called "regulator-ramp-disable" causes the flag buckN_ramp to be set to
> true - if the ramp is being disabled I'd expect a flag with that name to
> be false not true.  Seems something isn't named right.

Yes, it seems incorrect but in existing code based on pdata, its name like that.
If you insist, I can rename it ? as It seems sensible to put
"regulator-ramp-disable" as our intension is to do that(by default its
always enable).


Thanks,
Yadwinder
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/