Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.10

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Tue Jul 02 2013 - 17:33:29 EST


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> + warning: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1ad7a4): Section mismatch in reference from the function pwmchip_add() to the function .init.text:pcibios_fixup_bus(): => N/A
>>> + warning: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1b18d8): Section mismatch in reference from the function pci_scan_child_bus() to the function .init.text:pcibios_fixup_bus(): => N/A
>>
>> I understand the second warning, but not the first (reference from
>> pwmchip_add() to pcibios_fixup_bus()). I don't think pwmchip_add()
>> calls pcibios_fixup_bus(). Is the pwmchip_chip() function name
>> inexact, or is there some other problem here?
>
> Indeed, that's weird.
>
> This happened with xtensa-allmodconfig.
> I compiled my own xtensa-allmodconfig kernel, and it happens there, too.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the hex address between parentheses should match
> the "from" function, right?
> After disassembly ("xtensa-linux-objdump -D vmlinux"), the addresses
> didn't seem to match the function names at all.
> So it may be an issue with the toolchain?

OK, I sent an xtensa patch to fix the
pci_scan_child_bus()/pcibios_fixup_bus() mismatch; I wouldn't be
surprised if that makes this pwmchip_add() thing go away, too.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/