Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:46:59AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So on the biggest system I've got; 4 nodes 32 cpus:
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './numa02' (5 runs):
> 
> 3.10.0+ + patches - NO_NUMA	58.235353126 seconds time elapsed    ( +-  0.45% )
> 3.10.0+ + patches -    NUMA   17.580963359 seconds time elapsed    ( +-  0.09% )

I just 'noticed' that I included my migrate_degrades_locality patch -- the one
posted somewhere in this thread (+ compile fixes).

Let me re-run without that one to see if there's any difference.

NO_NUMA		57.961384751 seconds time elapsed    ( +-  0.64% )
   NUMA		17.482115801 seconds time elapsed    ( +-  0.15% )
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/